Bright v. Goshen Sanitarium Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bright v. Goshen Sanitarium Co.

1 A.D.2d 670, 146 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3953

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 5, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 670 (Bright v. Goshen Sanitarium Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bright v. Goshen Sanitarium Co., 1 A.D.2d 670, 146 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover a loan made to respondent by one Seward, of whose personal property and rents and profits of real property appellant is the receiver, order granting leave, on terms, to open a default and to serve an answer reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. No excuse at all is offered for failure to appear or answer. Despite knowledge of the existence of the default judgment, the application to vacate it was not made for more than a year after its entry. There is no square contradiction of appellant’s statement that he did not consent to vacate the judgment. If the claim as to the shifting of indebtedness between respondent and Seward had been timely presented as a defense, his wife could then have renewed her contempt motion on the ground that sequestration was thereby shown to be unavailable. Wenzel, Acting P. J., MaeCrate, Beldoek, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover a loan made to respondent by one Seward, of whose personal property and rents and profits of real property appellant is the receiver, order granting leave, on terms, to open a default and to serve an answer reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. No excuse at all is offered for failure to appear or answer. Despite knowledge of the existence of the default judgment, the application to vacate it was not made for more than a year after its entry. There is no square contradiction of appellant’s statement that he did not consent to vacate the judgment. If the claim as to the shifting of indebtedness between respondent and Seward had been timely presented as a defense, his wife could then have renewed her contempt motion on the ground that sequestration was thereby shown to be unavailable. Wenzel, Acting P. J., MaeCrate, Beldoek, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 670, 146 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bright-v-goshen-sanitarium-co-nyappdiv-1955.