Bright v. . Bright

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Bright v. . Bright

44 S.E.2d 76, 227 N.C. 704, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 504

DecidedSeptember 24, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 44 S.E.2d 76 (Bright v. . Bright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bright v. . Bright, 44 S.E.2d 76, 227 N.C. 704, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 504 (N.C. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It may be that, on this record, defendant’s plea of res judicata is sufficient to sustain the judgment below. This we need not decide, for a careful examination of the record fails to disclose any evidence tending to show that plaintiff suffered his loss as a proximate result of actionable negligence of the defendant. For that reason the judgment below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It may be that, on this record, defendant’s plea of res judicata is sufficient to sustain the judgment below. This we need not decide, for a careful examination of the record fails to disclose any evidence tending to show that plaintiff suffered his loss as a proximate result of actionable negligence of the defendant. For that reason the judgment below is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 S.E.2d 76, 227 N.C. 704, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bright-v-bright-nc-1947.