Bright v. Bright

118 S.E. 427, 156 Ga. 42, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 194
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 13, 1923·No. No. 3522·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

There were such issues of fact as to the loss or destruction of the paper alleged to be a will as should have been submitted to a jury for determination ;■ and the trial judge therefore erred in directing a verdict.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Atloinson and Gilbert, JJ., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bright v. Bright, 118 S.E. 427, 156 Ga. 42, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 194 (Ga. 1923).

118 S.E. 427 (Bright v. Bright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peek v. Irwin
139 S.E. 27 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)