Bright ex rel. Knorr v. Diamond

42 A. 45, 189 Pa. 476, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 673

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The facts set out in the defendant’s petition to have the judgment opened were clearly sufficient to justify the court in making the rule absolute. There was corroborative testimony given which supported the allegations contained in the petition. As a matter of course the mere order to open did not assume to make any disposition of the costs or attorney’s commission, and that subject is left entirely open for future determination.

Order affirmed.