Bright ex rel. Bright v. Wilsons

1 N.C. 24
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 15, 1800
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 24 (Bright ex rel. Bright v. Wilsons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bright ex rel. Bright v. Wilsons, 1 N.C. 24 (N.C. 1800).

Opinion

Johnston, Judge

I am of opinion that the judgment of the County Court should be affirmed.

Taylor, Judge

No special errors are assigned in this case, and I have not upon a view of the record been able to discern any; the writ in its substantial parts is conformable to the precedent in the register, and though the judgment does not appear to be rendered according to 6 Ed. I. for the place wasted, yet that omission being for the defendants benefit, was not, I presume, intended to be assigned.

Macay, Judge

I am also of opinion, that the judgment of the County Court should be affirmed.

Judgment for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.C. 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bright-ex-rel-bright-v-wilsons-nc-1800.