Brigham v. Smith

70 Mass. 297
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 70 Mass. 297 (Brigham v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brigham v. Smith, 70 Mass. 297 (Mass. 1855).

Opinion

Thomas, J.

If A conveys land to B, to which B can have access only by passing over other land of A, a way of necessity passes by the grant. If A conveys land to B, leaving other-land of A, to which he can have access only by passing over the land granted, a way of necessity is reserved in the grant. These points are settled, as well in the cases cited for the plaintiff', as those cited for the defendant.

Is the rule affected by the fact that the grantor conveyed by deed of warranty ? We think not. If the way were expressly reserved in the deed, the covenants must apply to the premises granted, that is, an estate with a right of way reserved or carved out of the fee. In the present case, the law does for the parties the same thing, and the covenants apply to an estate with this way of necessity reserved.

Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Powers v. Heffernan
84 N.E. 661 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1908)
Fritz v. . Tompkins
61 N.E. 893 (New York Court of Appeals, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 Mass. 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brigham-v-smith-mass-1855.