Brigham v. Marean
This text of 24 Mass. 40 (Brigham v. Marean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We see no objection to the action on account of its being brought in the name of Brigham. 1
The two notes for 65 dollars each were usurious, and being included in the note described in the second count, rendered that also usurious; and three-fold the whole interest, usurious as well as lawful, must be deducted from the sum due on the contract. 2
The plaintiff prevails on the first count and must recover his costs under the general statute provision respecting costs, and the defendant is also entitled to recover his costs, by virtue of St. 1826, c. 27.3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 Mass. 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brigham-v-marean-mass-1828.