Brigham v. Lally
130 Mass. 485, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 142
Opinion
The ruling requested was rightly refused. The question whether the note was taken as payment was a question of fact, on which there was conflicting evidence, and the finding of the judge by whom the case was tried without a jury was conclusive.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brigham v. Lally, 130 Mass. 485, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 142 (Mass. 1881).
130 Mass. 485 (Brigham v. Lally) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Borden v. Fine
98 N.E. 1073 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1912)
American Malting Co. v. Souther Brewing Co.
80 N.E. 526 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Agawam National Bank v. Downing
47 N.E. 1016 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Cheltenham Stone & Gravel Co. v. Gates Iron Works
16 N.E. 923 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1888)
Cheltenham Stone & Gravel Co. v. Gates Iron Works
23 Ill. App. 635 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1887)