Brigham Exploration Company, Ben M. Brigham, David T. Brigham, Harold D. Carter, Stephen P. Reynolds, Stephen C. Hurley, Hobart A. Smith, Scott W. Tinker, Statoil ASA, and Fargo Acquisition, Inc. v. Raymond Boytim, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated
This text of Brigham Exploration Company, Ben M. Brigham, David T. Brigham, Harold D. Carter, Stephen P. Reynolds, Stephen C. Hurley, Hobart A. Smith, Scott W. Tinker, Statoil ASA, and Fargo Acquisition, Inc. v. Raymond Boytim, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated (Brigham Exploration Company, Ben M. Brigham, David T. Brigham, Harold D. Carter, Stephen P. Reynolds, Stephen C. Hurley, Hobart A. Smith, Scott W. Tinker, Statoil ASA, and Fargo Acquisition, Inc. v. Raymond Boytim, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 15, 2014
NO. 03-13-00191-CV
Brigham Exploration Company, Ben M. Brigham, David T. Brigham, Harold D. Carter, Stephen P. Reynolds, Stephen C. Hurley, Hobart A. Smith, Scott W. Tinker, Statoil ASA, and Fargo Acquisition, Inc., Appellants
v.
Raymond Boytim, Hugh Duncan, Robert Fioravanta, Walter Schwimmer, Michael Ohler, Ryan Ohler, Walter Ohler, Jr., The Edward J. Goodman Life Income Trust and The Edward J. Goodman Generation Skipping Trust, Jeffrey Whalen, and Howard Weissberg, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Appellees
APPEAL FROM 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD REVERSED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on February 26, 2013.
Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible
error in the court’s interlocutory order. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s
interlocutory order and remands the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with
the Court’s opinion. The appellees shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court
and in the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brigham Exploration Company, Ben M. Brigham, David T. Brigham, Harold D. Carter, Stephen P. Reynolds, Stephen C. Hurley, Hobart A. Smith, Scott W. Tinker, Statoil ASA, and Fargo Acquisition, Inc. v. Raymond Boytim, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brigham-exploration-company-ben-m-brigham-david-t-brigham-harold-d-texapp-2014.