Briggs v. United States
This text of 48 F.3d 288 (Briggs v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Based on information first disclosed in the petition for rehearing and response, Judge Frank J. Magill has concluded that he must withdraw from the panel and recuse himself in this matter. The panel’s opinion and judgment of December 28, 1994, are hereby vacated. The pending petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc are mooted by this action.
The panel has directed the Clerk of Court to randomly select a judge to replace Judge Magill, and the Clerk has selected Judge Pasco M. Bowman. The ease will now be submitted to the panel.
In the event the panel determines that oral argument or additional briefing are necessary, the clerk’s office will notify counsel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 F.3d 288, 1995 WL 60552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/briggs-v-united-states-ca8-1995.