Briggs v. United States

622 F. App'x 237
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 12, 2015
DocketNo. 15-1317
StatusPublished

This text of 622 F. App'x 237 (Briggs v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Briggs v. United States, 622 F. App'x 237 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Byron C. Briggs appeals the ■ district court’s orders denying his motion to set aside the Government’s scope-of-employment certification, see 28 U.S.C. § 2679(b)(1), (d)(1) (2012), and granting the Government’s motion to dismiss his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Briggs v. United States, No. 5:13-cv-00844-BR, 2015 WL 72123 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2015; Feb. 2, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Exclusiveness of remedy
28 U.S.C. § 2679(b)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 F. App'x 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/briggs-v-united-states-ca4-2015.