Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Briggs v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.

Briggs v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.

114 A. 538, 92 N.J. Eq. 277, 7 Stock. 277, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 330
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 21, 1920·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Buchanan.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenoi-iard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Herpentieimer, Ackerson—10. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Briggs v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 114 A. 538, 92 N.J. Eq. 277, 7 Stock. 277, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 330 (N.J. 1920).

114 A. 538 (Briggs v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pittston Company v. Allianz Insurance Company
124 F.3d 508 (Third Circuit, 1997)
Pittston Co. Ultramar America Ltd. v. Allianz Insurance
124 F.3d 508 (Third Circuit, 1997)
Sumitomo MacHinery Corporation of America, Inc. v. Alliedsignal, Inc.
81 F.3d 328 (Third Circuit, 1996)
Sumitomo Machinery v. AlliedSignal Inc
Third Circuit, 1996
Bellows v. E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.
359 F. Supp. 204 (N.D. Illinois, 1973)
Leeds and Lippincott Co. v. Nevius
144 A.2d 4 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)
Mechanical Ice Tray Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
144 F.2d 720 (Second Circuit, 1944)