Briggs v. Union Pacific Railroad

251 U.S. 540, 40 S. Ct. 118, 64 L. Ed. 404, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1819
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 8, 1919
DocketNo. 116
StatusPublished

This text of 251 U.S. 540 (Briggs v. Union Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Briggs v. Union Pacific Railroad, 251 U.S. 540, 40 S. Ct. 118, 64 L. Ed. 404, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1819 (1919).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726. Mr. Joseph G. Waters for plaintiff in error. Mr. N. H. Loomis, Mr. T. M. Lillard, Mr. Edson Rich, Mr. R. W. Blair and Mr. H. W. Clarke for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 U.S. 540, 40 S. Ct. 118, 64 L. Ed. 404, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/briggs-v-union-pacific-railroad-scotus-1919.