Briggs v. The Whitehall

S.D. New York

Briggs v. The Whitehall

68 F. 1022, 1895 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York

DecidedJune 11, 1895

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 68 F. 1022 (Briggs v. The Whitehall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Briggs v. The Whitehall, 68 F. 1022, 1895 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145 (S.D.N.Y. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWN, District Judge.

At about 7:40 o’clock of October 20, 1894, as tbe ferryboat Whitehall was making her trip from Hamilton avenue, Brooklyn, to her slip at tbe Battery, in a dense fog, sbe came in collision with tbe libelantis-lighter M. S. Bernite, which was under sail, in a light breeze, in tbe first of tbe flood tide when abreast of Governor’s Island and probably about one-third of tbe distance aero'ss tbe stream. Tbe lighter bad left tbe wharf at the Union Stores, about three blocks above tbe Hamilton Avenue Ferry, at a [1023]*1023little after 7 a. m. At that time the weather was clear. She was overtaken by dense fog some 10 or 15 minutes before collision.

The coming of a dense fog was perceived a few minutes before the lighter was enveloped in it. She was right in the path of ferryboats, and was proceeding very slowly. In that.situation I think it was the duty of the lighter to remove herself from the necessary track of ferryboats, and towards the Governor’s Island shore, and there come to anchor, as she might easily have done. ' This was a plain and simple means of avoiding certain danger to herself and to the ferryboats, which were under a public necessity of crossing from Brooklyn to Yew York.

The witnesses from the schooner testify that their fog horns were properly blown. It is certain that they were not heard upon the ferryboat, and that the ferryboat was also proceeding slowly. These facts are proved not only by the ferryboat’s men, but by other trustworthy and expert witnesses, who were carefully listening for fog signals. Considering the eccentricities of sound in fog (The Lepanto, 21 Fed. 651, 656-658), I cannot, therefore, find the ferryboat in fault for not bearing the schooner’s fog signals, if they were given; nor does the evidence show any excess of speed. The ferryboat was not obliged to stop navigation during the fog; no rule of navigation requires this. The public necessities require that traffic shall not be wholly discontinued, and I cannot find, upon, the testimony, that the ferryboat was not going at as moderate speed as was practicable; so that if the collision is not to be deemed due to any remissness of the schooner, as to the sounding of fog signals, or in not putting herself out of the way of the known track of the ferryboats, it must be set down to unavoidable casualties of navigation.

Libel dismissed, without costs.

End of Cases in Vol. 68.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROWN, District Judge.

At about 7:40 o’clock of October 20, 1894, as tbe ferryboat Whitehall was making her trip from Hamilton avenue, Brooklyn, to her slip at tbe Battery, in a dense fog, sbe came in collision with tbe libelantis-lighter M. S. Bernite, which was under sail, in a light breeze, in tbe first of tbe flood tide when abreast of Governor’s Island and probably about one-third of tbe distance aero'ss tbe stream. Tbe lighter bad left tbe wharf at the Union Stores, about three blocks above tbe Hamilton Avenue Ferry, at a [1023]*1023little after 7 a. m. At that time the weather was clear. She was overtaken by dense fog some 10 or 15 minutes before collision.

The coming of a dense fog was perceived a few minutes before the lighter was enveloped in it. She was right in the path of ferryboats, and was proceeding very slowly. In that.situation I think it was the duty of the lighter to remove herself from the necessary track of ferryboats, and towards the Governor’s Island shore, and there come to anchor, as she might easily have done. ' This was a plain and simple means of avoiding certain danger to herself and to the ferryboats, which were under a public necessity of crossing from Brooklyn to Yew York.

The witnesses from the schooner testify that their fog horns were properly blown. It is certain that they were not heard upon the ferryboat, and that the ferryboat was also proceeding slowly. These facts are proved not only by the ferryboat’s men, but by other trustworthy and expert witnesses, who were carefully listening for fog signals. Considering the eccentricities of sound in fog (The Lepanto, 21 Fed. 651, 656-658), I cannot, therefore, find the ferryboat in fault for not bearing the schooner’s fog signals, if they were given; nor does the evidence show any excess of speed. The ferryboat was not obliged to stop navigation during the fog; no rule of navigation requires this. The public necessities require that traffic shall not be wholly discontinued, and I cannot find, upon, the testimony, that the ferryboat was not going at as moderate speed as was practicable; so that if the collision is not to be deemed due to any remissness of the schooner, as to the sounding of fog signals, or in not putting herself out of the way of the known track of the ferryboats, it must be set down to unavoidable casualties of navigation.

Libel dismissed, without costs.

End of Cases in Vol. 68.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 F. 1022, 1895 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/briggs-v-the-whitehall-nysd-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack