Briggs v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 1, 2025·No. 1D2025-1801·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2025-1801

SPENCER BRIGGS, Petitioner, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

October 1, 2025

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003)

(holding that generally, a criminal defendant cannot proceed pro se while represented by counsel).

LEWIS, ROBERTS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Spencer Briggs, pro se, Petitioner. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Briggs v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Briggs v. State of Florida (Briggs v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Logan v. State
846 So. 2d 472 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)