Briggs v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Briggs v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 1, 2025

Docket1D2025-1801

StatusPublished

This text of Briggs v. State of Florida (Briggs v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Briggs v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2025-1801 _____________________________

SPENCER BRIGGS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

October 1, 2025

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003) (holding that generally, a criminal defendant cannot proceed pro se while represented by counsel).

LEWIS, ROBERTS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Spencer Briggs, pro se, Petitioner.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI