Briggs v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedFebruary 7, 2024
Docket21-0697V
StatusUnpublished

This text of Briggs v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Briggs v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Briggs v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-0697V

ERIN BRIGGS, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: January 5, 2024 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Katrina Sandifer Brown, Brown Bass & Jeter, PLLC, Jackson, MS, for Petitioner.

Alexa Roggenkamp, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

On January 12, 2021, Erin Briggs filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) resulting from a tetanus diphtheria acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccine received on April 29, 2020. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed January 4, 2024, at ¶¶ 2-4. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered in the United States, her injury persisted for more than six months, and there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her injury or condition. Petition at ¶¶ 2, 17-19; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5; Ex. 2 at 54. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the vaccine caused or significantly aggravated petitioner’s alleged left shoulder injury or any other injury, and denies that her current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Nevertheless, on January 4, 2024, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $60,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

ERIN BRIGGS,

Petitioner,

v. No. 21-697V Chief Special Master Corcoran SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES,

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Erin Briggs ("petitioner") filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l0 to -34 (the "Vaccine Program").

The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt of a tetanus,

diphtheria, and acellular pertussis ("Tdap") vaccine, which is a vaccine contained in the Vaccine

Injury Table (the "Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received the Tdap vaccine on April 29, 2020.

3. The vaccination was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she sustained a left shoulder injury related to vaccination

administration ("SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the Table following administration

of the Tdap vaccine, or in the alternative, that her alleged shoulder injury was caused by the

Tdap vaccine. She further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of this alleged injury

for more than six months. 5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on her behalf as a result of her alleged injury or condition.

6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the

vaccine caused or significantly aggravated petitioner's alleged left shoulder injury or any other

injury, and denies that her current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry ofjudgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the tenns of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $60,000.00 in the fonn of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l5(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry ofjudgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2 l(a)(l ), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings

before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding

upon this petition.

I0. Petitioner and her attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l 5(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-2
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l)
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
§ 300aa-l0
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l0
§ 300aa-l5
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l5(a)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Briggs v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/briggs-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2024.