Briggs v. Osram Sylvania, Inc.
This text of Briggs v. Osram Sylvania, Inc. (Briggs v. Osram Sylvania, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 97-2304
MICHAEL BRIGGS,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
OSRAM SYLVANIA, INC., ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. Morton A. Brody, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge, Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
Michael Briggs on brief pro se. Barry A. Bachrach and Bowditch & Dewey, LLP on brief for appellees.
May 7, 1998
Per Curiam. We have carefully reviewed the record and briefs on appeal and affirm the judgment below. Upon summary judgment, the evidence was unequivocal that the appellant was an employee of the appellee with wages subject to mandatory withholding. 26 U.S.C. 3402(a)(1) and 3102(a). An employer cannot be liable to its employee for complying with its legal duty to withhold federal taxes. Chandler v. Perini Power Constructors, Inc., 520 F. Supp. 1152, 1155-1156 (D.H. 1981)(stating also that the constitutionality of federal tax withholding statutes is so well established as to render nugatory any challenge thereto); Bright v. Bechtel Petroleum, Inc. 780 F.2d 766 (9th Cir. 1986). The arguments that appellant raises for the first time on appeal are not properly before us. Affirmed. Loc.R. 27.1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Briggs v. Osram Sylvania, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/briggs-v-osram-sylvania-inc-ca1-1998.