Briggs v. Kansas
This text of 242 U.S. 615 (Briggs v. Kansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Dreyer v. Illinois, 187 U. S. 71, 83-84; Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line, 211 U. S. 210, 225; (2) Baldwin v. Kansas, 129 U. S. 52; [616]*616Spies v. Illinois, 123 U. S. 131; Jacobi v. Alabama, 187 U. S. 133; (3) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 311; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Insurance Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; (4) Moore v. Missouri, 159 U. S. 673; McDonald v. Massachusetts, 180 U. S. 311; Graham v. West Virginia, 224 U. S. 616; Carlesi v. New York, 233 U. S. 51. Mr. A. M. Harvey for the plaintiff in error. Mr. James P. Coleman for the defendant in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 U.S. 615, 37 S. Ct. 211, 61 L. Ed. 529, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/briggs-v-kansas-scotus-1916.