Briggs v. Hyde Park Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Briggs v. Hyde Park Central School District

214 A.D.2d 728, 625 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4466

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 214 A.D.2d 728 (Briggs v. Hyde Park Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Briggs v. Hyde Park Central School District, 214 A.D.2d 728, 625 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4466 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents which discharged the petitioner from his employment.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The petitioner, a maintenance mechanic with the respondents, was discharged from his job after a hearing. The hearing concerned three charges against the petitioner arising from his failure to report an accident that occurred while he was driving a school vehicle. The respondents adopted the Hearing Officer’s determination of guilt as to all three charges and his recommendation of dismissal.

Contrary to the petitioner’s arguments, all three charges were supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135; Matter of County of Suffolk v Newman, 173 AD2d 618). Further, in light of the petitioner’s past record of suspensions, his apparent lack of safe and diligent work habits, and his guilt of the charges herein, the penalty of dismissal imposed by the respondents was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Balletta, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents which discharged the petitioner from his employment.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

The petitioner, a maintenance mechanic with the respondents, was discharged from his job after a hearing. The hearing concerned three charges against the petitioner arising from his failure to report an accident that occurred while he was driving a school vehicle. The respondents adopted the Hearing Officer’s determination of guilt as to all three charges and his recommendation of dismissal.

Contrary to the petitioner’s arguments, all three charges were supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135; Matter of County of Suffolk v Newman, 173 AD2d 618). Further, in light of the petitioner’s past record of suspensions, his apparent lack of safe and diligent work habits, and his guilt of the charges herein, the penalty of dismissal imposed by the respondents was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Balletta, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 A.D.2d 728, 625 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/briggs-v-hyde-park-central-school-district-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack