Briggs v. City of St. Louis

Missouri Court of Appeals

Briggs v. City of St. Louis

823 S.W.2d 67, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1709, 1991 WL 238268

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 19, 1991·No. No. 59837·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from a circuit court judgment affirming a final order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his claim for worker’s compensation. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from a circuit court judgment affirming a final order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his claim for worker’s compensation. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Briggs v. City of St. Louis, 823 S.W.2d 67, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1709, 1991 WL 238268 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

823 S.W.2d 67 (Briggs v. City of St. Louis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.