Briggs v. City of Huntsville

545 So. 2d 171, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 214, 1989 WL 53218
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 7, 1989·No. 87-1449·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

MADDOX, Justice.

By quashing the writ, we should not be understood as approving or disapproving the language used, or the statements of law contained, in the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals. Cf. Cooper v. State, 287 Ala. 728, 252 So.2d 108 (1971).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

[172]*172HORNSBY, C.J., and SHORES, ADAMS, HOUSTON and STEAGALL, JJ., concur. JONES, ALMON and KENNEDY, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Briggs v. City of Huntsville, 545 So. 2d 171, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 214, 1989 WL 53218 (Ala. 1989).

545 So. 2d 171 (Briggs v. City of Huntsville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pierce v. State
217 So. 3d 64 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2016)
Reese v. City of Dothan
642 So. 2d 511 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1993)
Harry v. State
571 So. 2d 392 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Frazier v. City of Montgomery
565 So. 2d 1255 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)