Briggs v. City of Asheville
This text of Briggs v. City of Asheville (Briggs v. City of Asheville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2079
JOSEPH N. BRIGGS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CITY OF ASHEVILLE, Police Department; BUNCOME COUNTY SHERIFF,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-05-73-1)
Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 27, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph N. Briggs, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis W. Euler, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Asheville, North Carolina; Julie M. Kepple, BUNCOMBE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Joseph N. Briggs appeals the district court’s order
denying his Motion for Final Execution and Order to Preclude Exempt
Property Rights. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Briggs v. City of Asheville, No. CA-05-73-
1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Briggs v. City of Asheville, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/briggs-v-city-of-asheville-ca4-2006.