Briggs v. Casey

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VERON BRIGGS, Plaintiff, 1:22-CV-1221 v. (DNH/DJS) JUSTIN BYRNES, ef al., Defendants. o

APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: VERON BRIGGS Plaintiff Pro Se Troy, New York 12182 PATTISON, SAMPSON, GINSBERG, RHIANNON I. GIFFORD, ESQ. & GRIFFIN Attorney for Defendants 22 First Street .| P.O. Box 208 Troy, New York 12181-0208 DANIEL J. STEWART United States Magistrate Judge ORDER On March 10, 2023, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to FED. R. CIv. P. 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative for a More Definite Statement under Rule 12(e). Dkt. No. 16. The

Court converted the Motion to a Motion for Summary Judgment and set a briefing schedule. Dkt. No. 19. Plaintiff has now filed, as of right, an Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 20. The Amended Complaint sets forth legal theories distinct from the Complaint and that are not addressed by the Motion for Summary Judgment. See generally id. In the Court’s view, the filing of an Amended Complaint moots the pending dispositive Motion. See Hanrahan v. Menon, 2010 WL 984279,

-|-

at *1 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2010); Hill v. Chalanor, 2008 WL 907363, at *1 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2008). ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ORDERED, that Defendants’ Motion (Dkt. No. 16) is DENIED as moot; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants shall answer or otherwise with respect to the Amended Complaint on or before April 28, 2023; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order upon the parties in accordance with the Local Rules. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 31, 2023 Albany, New York

. ZL; eiged i US-Magistrate Judge

wn

-2-