Briggs v. Brown
This text of 3 Hill & Den. 87 (Briggs v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plea denies a wrongful conversion of the goods, and is therefore open to the objection pointed out by the demurrer, viz. that it amounts to the general issue. There are conflicting decisions in the books on the question what special pleas are allowable in trover. We think none should be allowed except such as admit that the plaintiff once had a good cause of action, as a release, accord and satisfaction, former re[88]*88covery, bankrupt discharge, and the like. This plea denies that the plaintiff ever had a good cause of action.
Judgment for the plaintiff,
See Hurst v. Cook, (19 Wend. 463 to 470,) and the cases there cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Hill & Den. 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/briggs-v-brown-nysupct-1842.