Briggs v. Briggs
3 Johns. 258
This text of 3 Johns. 258 (Briggs v. Briggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Briggs v. Briggs, 3 Johns. 258 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).
Opinion
The affidavit is not sufficient. It does not state that the attorney derived his information from the defendant or from his counsel, nor from whom it was obtained. The rule must be denied.
Rule refused-.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hauswirth v. Sullivan
6 Mont. 203 (Montana Supreme Court, 1886)
Sneaghan v. Briggs
1 Wilson 75 (Indiana Super. Ct., 1871)
Clow v. Woods
5 Serg. & Rawle 275 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1819)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Johns. 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/briggs-v-briggs-nysupct-1808.