Briggs v. Aetna Pharmacy Management

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided December 31, 2024·No. 3:24-cv-05681·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT AT TACOMA CHRISTOPHER BRIGGS, Case No. 3:24-cv-05681-TMC Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. AETNA PHARMACY MANAGEMENT, Defendant.

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Theresa L. Fricke, United States Magistrate Judge; an additional proposed amended complaint filed by Plaintiff Christopher Briggs; and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER: 1. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. a. Mr. Briggs did not file objections to the Report and Recommendation. Within the time for filing objections, however, he submitted a new proposed amended complaint. Dkt. 8. Construing the proposed amended complaint liberally as an objection, the Court has conducted de novo review of the Report and Recommendation. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). l b. Mr. Briggs’s new proposed amended complaint contains the same problems as his previous proposed amended complaint. For the reasons explained by the Magistrate Judge, see Dkt. 7 at 3-4, Mr. Briggs’s allegations do not show a legal claim for relief. 2. Plaintiffs action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record, to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address, and to the Honorable Theresa L. Fricke. Dated this 31st day of December, 2024. " Lag TiffanyM. Cartwright United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Briggs v. Aetna Pharmacy Management, (W.D. Wash. 2024).

Briggs v. Aetna Pharmacy Management (Briggs v. Aetna Pharmacy Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related