Brigette Huit v. Frank Trevino

Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-00632-PA-JEM Document Filed 03/30/22 Pagelof1 Page ID He 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRIGETTE HUIT, CASE NUMBER CV22-0632-PA (JEM) PLAINTIFF(S) v. FRANK TREVINO, ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS DEFENDANT(S)

IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby GRANTED.

Date United States Magistrate Judge

IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED for the following reason(s): [] Inadequate showing of indigency [] District Court lacks jurisdiction x] Legally and/or factually patently frivolous [] Immunity as to Other:

Comments: Complaint is largely unintelligible. Lacks an arguable basis in law or fact. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). Plaintiff's claims, which include allegations of a widespread conspiracy, are wholly fanciful; she is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1227-28 (9th Cir. 1984). Recommend immediate dismissal.

2/4/2022 /s/ John E. McDermott Date United States Magistrate Judge IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby: [] GRANTED DENIED (see comments above). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: [_] Plaintiff SHALL PAY THE FILING FEES IN FULL within 30 days or this case will be dismissed. [X] This case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. □□□ This case is hereby REMANDED to state court. aN i, / Sip — i a Zz March 30, 2022 { a C4427 Z Date United States District Judge CV-73 (08/16) ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS