Brierley v. Connelly
35 Misc. 820, 72 N.Y.S. 1095
This text of 35 Misc. 820 (Brierley v. Connelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brierley v. Connelly, 35 Misc. 820, 72 N.Y.S. 1095 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).
Opinion
There were- questions of fact upon which the evidence was conflicting. The case was submitted to the jury under an unexceptionable charge. There are no exceptions in the case calling for comment.
Judgment should be affirmed, with costs, without opinion.
Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 Misc. 820, 72 N.Y.S. 1095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brierley-v-connelly-nyappterm-1901.