Brienza v. Unity Amusement Corp.

248 A.D. 586

This text of 248 A.D. 586 (Brienza v. Unity Amusement Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brienza v. Unity Amusement Corp., 248 A.D. 586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Order denying on condition defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for failure to prosecute reversed on the law, without costs, and motion granted, without costs. No affidavit of plaintiff was submitted on the motion. There is not an adequate showing of merits, nor does the nature or extent of plaintiff’s injuries appear. In view of the statement in plaintiff’s attorney’s affidavit as to plaintiff’s impoverished condition, he should have applied to sue as a poor person. In our opinion it was an improper exercise of discretion to deny the motion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brienza-v-unity-amusement-corp-nyappdiv-1936.