Brienza v. Brienza

213 A.D.2d 364, 624 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2456

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, J.), dated April 7, 1994, which, inter alia, dismissed the action for failure of proof.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There is no basis in the record to find that the Supreme [365]*365Court erred in dismissing the plaintiffs action for divorce based upon constructive abandonment. When the determination of constructive abandonment is premised upon an evaluation of the credibility of the respective witnesses, the determination of the trier of fact, who heard and saw the witnesses, should be accorded great weight (see, Caso v Caso, 161 AD2d 683; Schottenfeld v Schottenfeld, 152 AD2d 690; Infosino v Infosino, 109 AD2d 869, 870).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Krausman and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brienza v. Brienza, 213 A.D.2d 364, 624 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2456 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

213 A.D.2d 364 (Brienza v. Brienza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Infosino v. Infosino
109 A.D.2d 869 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Schottenfeld v. Schottenfed
152 A.D.2d 690 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Caso v. Caso
161 A.D.2d 683 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)