Briegel v. Payne

155 F.2d 424, 81 U.S. App. D.C. 147, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2215
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided May 27, 1946·No. No. 9154·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee sued appellant for dissolution of an alleged partnership or joint adventure, an accounting, and appointment of a receiver. The District Court found that as to certain contracts obtained before August 19, 1943, appellant and appellee had been engaged in a joint adventure. The court directed its auditor to determine the amount of appellee’s one-half share in the profits. Afterwards, on November 5, 1945, the court appointed appellee’s counsel as receiver to take possession of the joint funds and hold them until further order of the court. This appeal is from the order of November 5. Appointment of 'a receiver was within the court’s discretion. Creel v. Creel, 63 App. D.C. 384, 73 F.2d 107. It is immaterial that the Creel case involved partners while this case involves joint adventurers. Appellant interprets the order of November 5 as including funds arising from contracts obtained after August 18, 1943, but this interpretation is erroneous.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Briegel v. Payne, 155 F.2d 424, 81 U.S. App. D.C. 147, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2215 (D.D.C. 1946).

155 F.2d 424 (Briegel v. Payne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. Delaney
647 A.2d 784 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1994)