Briefer v. Johnsen
This text of 32 Misc. 764 (Briefer v. Johnsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was regularly discharged in bankruptcy. Prior to his discharge, a judgment was obtained in this court against him. More than one year after such discharge was granted, he applied to have said judgment against him discharged. His motion should have been granted, without costs. It was error to grant this motion only upon the payment; it should have been granted unconditionally.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted, with- • out costs.
Conlan, J., concurs.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 Misc. 764, 66 N.Y.S. 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/briefer-v-johnsen-nynyccityct-1900.