Bridgman v. Dambly

43 N.W. 482, 41 Minn. 526, 1889 Minn. LEXIS 406
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 29, 1889
StatusPublished

This text of 43 N.W. 482 (Bridgman v. Dambly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bridgman v. Dambly, 43 N.W. 482, 41 Minn. 526, 1889 Minn. LEXIS 406 (Mich. 1889).

Opinion

By the Court.

The order appealed from is a discretionary order extending the time previously allowed defendant to answer and to pay costs. It was made upon notice, and upon cause shown. Such orders will not be revised by this court except in clear cases of abuse of discretion, which is not the case here.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 N.W. 482, 41 Minn. 526, 1889 Minn. LEXIS 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridgman-v-dambly-minn-1889.