Bridgman v. Bateman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bridgman v. Bateman

243 A.D. 572

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 572 (Bridgman v. Bateman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bridgman v. Bateman, 243 A.D. 572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion for order of mandamus, commanding [573]*573respondents, as mayor, and others, constituting the board of estimate and contract of the city of Mount Vernon, to revoke certain resolutions adopted by the board of estimate and contract reducing salaries of policemen and firemen, unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion for order of mandamus, commanding [573]*573respondents, as mayor, and others, constituting the board of estimate and contract of the city of Mount Vernon, to revoke certain resolutions adopted by the board of estimate and contract reducing salaries of policemen and firemen, unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridgman-v-bateman-nyappdiv-1934.