Bridgman v. Bateman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bridgman v. Bateman

243 A.D. 572

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Order denying motion for order of mandamus, commanding [573]*573respondents, as mayor, and others, constituting the board of estimate and contract of the city of Mount Vernon, to revoke certain resolutions adopted by the board of estimate and contract reducing salaries of policemen and firemen, unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion for order of mandamus, commanding [573]*573respondents, as mayor, and others, constituting the board of estimate and contract of the city of Mount Vernon, to revoke certain resolutions adopted by the board of estimate and contract reducing salaries of policemen and firemen, unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.

Bridgman v. Bateman, 243 A.D. 572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

243 A.D. 572 (Bridgman v. Bateman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.