Bridgham v. Paine

Suffolk County Court

Bridgham v. Paine

2 Rec. Co. Ct. 1049

New York County Court, Suffolk County·Decided July 29, 1679·Published

Opinion

Ionathan Bridgham plaint. conta Moses Paine Sen1 Daniel Turell Sen1 as Admrs to the Estate of Iohn Clear Iunior late of Boston [1050] deced Defend* in an action of debt of Eighty nine pounds money due to bim from the Estate of sd Iohn Clear for the Forfiture of a bond datd 5. Febr 1677. with damages &ca. . . . The Iury . . . found for the plaint. Forfiture of the bond Eighty nine pounds money and costs of Court: Vpon Request of the plaint, hee craving onely his princi-pall: The Court chancered this Forfiture to Forty three pounds thirteen Shillings in money & costs of Court allowd thirty Shillings six pence.

Execution issued. 6. Aug° 1679. [ 596 ]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ionathan Bridgham plaint. conta Moses Paine Sen1 Daniel Turell Sen1 as Admrs to the Estate of Iohn Clear Iunior late of Boston [1050] deced Defend* in an action of debt of Eighty nine pounds money due to bim from the Estate of sd Iohn Clear for the Forfiture of a bond datd 5. Febr 1677. with damages &ca. . . . The Iury . . . found for the plaint. Forfiture of the bond Eighty nine pounds money and costs of Court: Vpon Request of the plaint, hee craving onely his princi-pall: The Court chancered this Forfiture to Forty three pounds thirteen Shillings in money & costs of Court allowd thirty Shillings six pence.

Execution issued. 6. Aug° 1679. [ 596 ]

Bridgham v. Paine, 2 Rec. Co. Ct. 1049 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1679).

Pincite

2 Rec. Co. Ct. 1049 (Bridgham v. Paine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.