Bridgewater v. Ocean City Railroad

52 A. 1130, 63 N.J. Eq. 798, 18 Dickinson 798, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 187
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 23, 1902·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Grey filed in the court below. See 17 DicTc. Oh. Rep. 276.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Port, Garretson, Pitney, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Yredenburgh, Voorhees—13. For reversal—Hendrickson, Yroom—2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bridgewater v. Ocean City Railroad, 52 A. 1130, 63 N.J. Eq. 798, 18 Dickinson 798, 1902 N.J. LEXIS 187 (N.J. 1902).

52 A. 1130 (Bridgewater v. Ocean City Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rossi v. Sierchio
105 A.2d 687 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Bright v. Forest Hill Park Development Co.
31 A.2d 190 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)
Radey v. Parr
153 A. 628 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1931)
Pound v. Pleister
150 A. 58 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)
Derossett v. Bianchi
136 A. 301 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)
Durham Essex Corp. v. Schaffer
133 A. 754 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)