Bridgetts & Co. v. United States

47 Cust. Ct. 242
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJune 27, 1961
DocketNo. 65858; protests 303393-K and 314074-K (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 47 Cust. Ct. 242 (Bridgetts & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bridgetts & Co. v. United States, 47 Cust. Ct. 242 (cusc 1961).

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the principles herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351), and that the quantities of merchandise, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty is not assessable upon the quantities of merchandise, which were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Browne Vintners Co.
34 C.C.P.A. 112 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 Cust. Ct. 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridgetts-co-v-united-states-cusc-1961.