Bridgette Kellar v. Roger Denton Dowden
This text of Bridgette Kellar v. Roger Denton Dowden (Bridgette Kellar v. Roger Denton Dowden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-22-00106-CV __________________
BRIDGETTE KELLAR, Appellant
V.
ROGER DENTON DOWDEN, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 258th District Court Polk County, Texas Trial Cause No. CIV32290 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Bridgette Kellar filed a notice of appeal from a nunc pro tunc writ of
possession. On April 6, 2022, we notified the parties that it appears the order being
appealed is neither a final judgment nor an appealable order. See Kirby v. Fletcher,
No. 12-21-00160-CV, 2021 WL 5118410, at *1 (Tex. App.—Tyler Nov. 3, 2021,
pet. dism’d w.o.j.) (mem op.) (A writ of possession that enforces a final judgment is
not separately appealable). We requested a response be filed by April 21, 2022 and
warned that the appeal would be dismissed without further notice unless we received
1 a written reply that established our jurisdiction over the appeal. The appellant has
failed to comply with the notice from the clerk requiring action within a specified
time. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Tex. R. App.
P. 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on May 25, 2022 Opinion Delivered May 26, 2022
Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bridgette Kellar v. Roger Denton Dowden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridgette-kellar-v-roger-denton-dowden-texapp-2022.