Bridgett Ausmus v. Wells Fargo Bank
This text of Bridgett Ausmus v. Wells Fargo Bank (Bridgett Ausmus v. Wells Fargo Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued July 17, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00324-CV ——————————— BRIDGET AUSMUS, Appellant V. WELLS FARGO BANK, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Probate Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CI50623
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Bridget Ausmus, has neither paid the required fees nor
established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1;
see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013);
Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts 1 of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket
No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1).
Further, Ausmus has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing
the clerk’s record, nor the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), (c). After
being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not
adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(b), (c).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of
prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bridgett Ausmus v. Wells Fargo Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridgett-ausmus-v-wells-fargo-bank-texapp-2014.