Bridgestone Corporation v. Juan MacIas Lopez
This text of Bridgestone Corporation v. Juan MacIas Lopez (Bridgestone Corporation v. Juan MacIas Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-02-526-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI- EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________________
BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
JUAN LOPEZ, ET AL., Appellees.
___________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 319th District Court of
Nueces County, Texas.
___________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON REMAND
Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez and Garza
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
In our original opinion in this case, issued April 1, 2004, we affirmed the trial court’s denial of appellant’s special appearance motion. Following the issuance of our opinion, a petition for review was filed in the Texas Supreme Court. Thereafter, the parties reached a settlement agreement. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the Texas Supreme Court granted the petition for review without reference to the merits, vacated this Court’s judgment, and remanded to this Court for further proceedings in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement.
On April 15, 2005, the parties filed a joint motion to withdraw this Court’s April 1, 2004 opinion. The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to withdraw our April 1, 2004 opinion, is of the opinion that the motion should be denied. The joint motion to withdraw our April 1, 2004 opinion is DENIED. However, pursuant to the parties’ representation that the settlement agreement has been approved by the trial court, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the Supreme Court’s orders, costs of the appeal and in the court below are adjudged against the party incurring the same.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this the 28th day of April, 2005.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bridgestone Corporation v. Juan MacIas Lopez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridgestone-corporation-v-juan-macias-lopez-texapp-2005.