Bridges v. Unknown

• Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
• Decided: April 1, 2024
• Docket: 9:24-cv-00061
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION SCOTTY BRIDGES §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-42 UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Scotty Bridges, a prisoner confined at the Gib Lewis Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against unknown employees of the Gib Lewis Unit. Discussion

When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in which the claim arose. However, under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it could have been brought. Such a transfer may be done sua sponte and is reviewable only for an abuse of discretion. Mills v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 886 F.2d 758, 761 (5th Cir. 1989). Plaintiff complains about incidents that took place at the Gib Lewis Unit, which is located

in the Lufkin Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. However, this case was filed in the Beaumont Division. The court has considered the circumstances and determined that the interests of justice would be served if the complaint were transferred to the division in which the claims arose. It is accordingly ORDERED that this civil rights action is TRANSFERRED to the Lufkin Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

SIGNED this Ist day of April, 2024.

Zack United States Magistrate Judge