Bridges v. State

1928 OK CR 83, 264 P. 640, 39 Okla. Crim. 183, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 272
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 28, 1928
DocketNo. A-6188.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1928 OK CR 83 (Bridges v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bridges v. State, 1928 OK CR 83, 264 P. 640, 39 Okla. Crim. 183, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 272 (Okla. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

DOYLE, P. J.

This appeal is from a conviction had in the district court of Greer county, rendered January 30, 1926, upon a verdict convicting appellant of the crime of robbery, and fixing the punishment at confinement in the state reformatory at Granite for a term of 15 years.

The information on which appellant was tried and convicted jointly charged appellant Wayne'Bridges and Roxie A. Seal, with the crime of robbery, committed December 5, 1925, by pointing a pistol at, and threatening to shoot, and taking from the possession of, J. T. Williams, $65. Each defendant was granted a separate trial. Appellant was tried first, with the result above stated. His codefendant upon her trial was acquitted.

The errors assigned question the sufficiency of the evidence, and that the punishment imposed is excessive.

Without the aid of oral argument or a brief on the part of appellant, we have carefully examined the record, and find there is sufficient evidence to sustain a verdict of guilty, but we do not think it called for the punishment assessed.

Counsel for the state, including the county attorney who prosecuted the case, concede that the sentence is too severe, and suggest that it be modified.

On the record before us, we are convinced that the punishment imposed is excessive, and that the sentence should be reduced to confinement in the state *185 reformatory at Granite for a term of 10 years. With this modification, the judgment is affirmed.

EDWARDS and DAVENPORT, JJ., concur. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cummings v. State
1935 OK CR 118 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1935)
Kelley v. State
1930 OK CR 266 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1928 OK CR 83, 264 P. 640, 39 Okla. Crim. 183, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridges-v-state-oklacrimapp-1928.