Bridges v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bridges v. State

249 S.W.3d 234, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 449, 2008 WL 850200

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 1, 2008

DocketED 89971

StatusPublished

This text of 249 S.W.3d 234 (Bridges v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bridges v. State, 249 S.W.3d 234, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 449, 2008 WL 850200 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Bridges (“Movant”) appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County denying his motion to vacate sentence under Rule 29.15. On appeal, Bridges claims that the motion court erred in denying his claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call Kenneth Lee as a witness and failing to discover Terry Pohlmann as a witness.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI