Bridges v. State

100 S.E. 796, 24 Ga. App. 361, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 663
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 4, 1919
Docket10913
StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 796 (Bridges v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bridges v. State, 100 S.E. 796, 24 Ga. App. 361, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 663 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. The excerpt from the charge of which complaint is made in the special ground of the motion for a new trial does not express or intimate the opinion of the presiding judge “as to what has or has not been proved or as to the guilt of the accused,” and, when read in connection with the entire charge, contains no error which requires this court to reverse the judgment of the trial court.

2. The verdict rendered is approved by the trial judge, and there is ample evidence to support it.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. C. W. Worrill, W. B. Parks, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.E. 796, 24 Ga. App. 361, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridges-v-state-gactapp-1919.