Bridges v. State
This text of 100 S.E. 796 (Bridges v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The excerpt from the charge of which complaint is made in the special ground of the motion for a new trial does not express or intimate the opinion of the presiding judge “as to what has or has not been proved or as to the guilt of the accused,” and, when read in connection with the entire charge, contains no error which requires this court to reverse the judgment of the trial court.
2. The verdict rendered is approved by the trial judge, and there is ample evidence to support it.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 S.E. 796, 24 Ga. App. 361, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridges-v-state-gactapp-1919.