Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bridges v. State

Bridges v. State

251 So. 3d 275
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 6, 2018·No. Case No. 5D18–973·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*276AFFIRMED without prejudice to Appellant filing a facially sufficient motion if he can do so in good faith. See Rosa v. State , 147 So.3d 583, 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

COHEN, C.J. and EVANDER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bridges v. State, 251 So. 3d 275 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

251 So. 3d 275 (Bridges v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hector Rosa v. State
147 So. 3d 583 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)