Bridges v. State

914 S.W.2d 762, 323 Ark. 565, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 122
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bridges v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 327 Ark. 392
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 26, 1996·No. CR 96-181·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant, Donald Bridges, has filed a motion for belated appeal or rule on the clerk. As he filed his notice of appeal prior to the disposition of a post-trial motion listed under Ark. R. App. P. 4(c), it was of no effect. Appellant’s attorney admits he was responsible for the failure to file an additional notice of appeal.

We treat the motion as one for a belated appeal and grant the motion. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Brown v. State, 321 Ark. 282, 900 S.W.2d 954 (1995). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bridges v. State, 914 S.W.2d 762, 323 Ark. 565, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 122 (Ark. 1996).

914 S.W.2d 762 (Bridges v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
900 S.W.2d 954 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1995)