Bridges v. Patterson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Bridges v. Patterson

96 A. 142, 114 Me. 549, 1915 Me. LEXIS 65

DecidedDecember 28, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 96 A. 142 (Bridges v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bridges v. Patterson, 96 A. 142, 114 Me. 549, 1915 Me. LEXIS 65 (Me. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Action of assumpsit to recover balance alleged to be due on sale of a certain quantity of fish. The verdict was for the plaintiff and the case is before this court on the usual motion for a new trial. There is no controversy concerning the law involved in the case. The issue was solely one of fact and it is the opinion of the court that the verdict of the jury was not so manifestly wrong as to warrant us in disturbing it.

Accordingly the entry must be motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action of assumpsit to recover balance alleged to be due on sale of a certain quantity of fish. The verdict was for the plaintiff and the case is before this court on the usual motion for a new trial. There is no controversy concerning the law involved in the case. The issue was solely one of fact and it is the opinion of the court that the verdict of the jury was not so manifestly wrong as to warrant us in disturbing it.

Accordingly the entry must be motion overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A. 142, 114 Me. 549, 1915 Me. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridges-v-patterson-me-1915.