Bridges v. Murray

667 S.E.2d 727, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 866, 2008 WL 4793294

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bridges v. Murray. Read the opinion of the Court — 667 S.E.2d 727 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 9, 2008·No. 121P08·Published

Opinion

667 S.E.2d 727 (2008)

No. 121P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of March 2008 by Plaintiff for "Notice of Appeal":

"Motion Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of October 2008."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

667 S.E.2d 727 (2008)

No. 121P08.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2008.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of March 2008 by Plaintiff for "Notice of Appeal":

"Motion Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of October 2008."

Bridges v. Murray, 667 S.E.2d 727, 2008 N.C. LEXIS 866, 2008 WL 4793294 (N.C. 2008).

Pincite

667 S.E.2d 727 (Bridges v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

667 S.E.2d 727 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2008)