Bridges v. Kuykendall & Brother

58 Miss. 827
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1881·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

A bill of exceptions, when signed and delivered by the judge, is a part of the record of the case in which it is taken, and, like any other part of the record in the cause, is not subject to alteration or amendment by the judge at his pleasure. If it is wrong when it is made part of the record in the cause, it must remain so, for no authority exists for its correction, either by this court or by the judge who signed it. Bank v. Kinsey, 5 Ala. 9 ; Kitchen v. Moye, 17 Ala. 394 ; The People v. Romero, 18 Cal. 89 ; Heard v. Heard, 8 Ga. 380; Georgia v. Powers, 14 Ga. 388; Hamilton v. Burch, 28 Ind. 233; Givens v. Bradley, 3 Bibb, 192; Shepard v. Hull, 42 Me. 377 ; Stimpson v. Railroad Co., 3 How. (U. S.) 553.

Motion sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bridges v. Kuykendall & Brother, 58 Miss. 827 (Mich. 1881).

58 Miss. 827 (Bridges v. Kuykendall & Brother) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tracy's Administratrix v. Carver Coal Co.
50 S.E. 825 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1905)
State v. Estes
51 P. 77 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1898)
Dreyfus v. Cage
62 Miss. 605 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1885)