Bridges v. Kuykendall & Brother

58 Miss. 827
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1881
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 58 Miss. 827 (Bridges v. Kuykendall & Brother) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bridges v. Kuykendall & Brother, 58 Miss. 827 (Mich. 1881).

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

A bill of exceptions, when signed and delivered by the judge, is a part of the record of the case in which it is taken, and, like any other part of the record in the cause, is not subject to alteration or amendment by the judge at his pleasure. If it is wrong when it is made part of the record in the cause, it must remain so, for no authority exists for its correction, either by this court or by the judge who signed it. Bank v. Kinsey, 5 Ala. 9 ; Kitchen v. Moye, 17 Ala. 394 ; The People v. Romero, 18 Cal. 89 ; Heard v. Heard, 8 Ga. 380; Georgia v. Powers, 14 Ga. 388; Hamilton v. Burch, 28 Ind. 233; Givens v. Bradley, 3 Bibb, 192; Shepard v. Hull, 42 Me. 377 ; Stimpson v. Railroad Co., 3 How. (U. S.) 553.

Motion sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tracy's Administratrix v. Carver Coal Co.
50 S.E. 825 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1905)
State v. Estes
51 P. 77 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1898)
Dreyfus v. Cage
62 Miss. 605 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Miss. 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridges-v-kuykendall-brother-miss-1881.