Bridges v. Kuykendall & Brother
This text of 58 Miss. 827 (Bridges v. Kuykendall & Brother) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
A bill of exceptions, when signed and delivered by the judge, is a part of the record of the case in which it is taken, and, like any other part of the record in the cause, is not subject to alteration or amendment by the judge at his pleasure. If it is wrong when it is made part of the record in the cause, it must remain so, for no authority exists for its correction, either by this court or by the judge who signed it. Bank v. Kinsey, 5 Ala. 9 ; Kitchen v. Moye, 17 Ala. 394 ; The People v. Romero, 18 Cal. 89 ; Heard v. Heard, 8 Ga. 380; Georgia v. Powers, 14 Ga. 388; Hamilton v. Burch, 28 Ind. 233; Givens v. Bradley, 3 Bibb, 192; Shepard v. Hull, 42 Me. 377 ; Stimpson v. Railroad Co., 3 How. (U. S.) 553.
Motion sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 Miss. 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridges-v-kuykendall-brother-miss-1881.