Bridges v. Blum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bridges v. Blum

78 A.D.2d 587, 432 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12985

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 26, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 78 A.D.2d 587 (Bridges v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bridges v. Blum, 78 A.D.2d 587, 432 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12985 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination unanimously confirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In this proceeding transferred to our court pursuant to CPLR 7804 (subd [g]) petitioner seeks review of a decision of respondent commissioner after a fair hearing affirming the agency’s determination to discontinue the aid to dependent children which petitioner was receiving on behalf of her two grandchildren. The record contains undisputed evidence that petitioner did not appear for a duly scheduled recertification interview (18 NYCRR 351.21) of which she had written notice and that she received and failed to respond to .the 10-day notice of proposed discontinuance of assistance (18 NYCRR 351.22). Thus, the respondent commissioner’s decision that the grant was properly terminated is supported by substantial evidence (300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Monroe Supreme Court.) Present— Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination unanimously confirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In this proceeding transferred to our court pursuant to CPLR 7804 (subd [g]) petitioner seeks review of a decision of respondent commissioner after a fair hearing affirming the agency’s determination to discontinue the aid to dependent children which petitioner was receiving on behalf of her two grandchildren. The record contains undisputed evidence that petitioner did not appear for a duly scheduled recertification interview (18 NYCRR 351.21) of which she had written notice and that she received and failed to respond to .the 10-day notice of proposed discontinuance of assistance (18 NYCRR 351.22). Thus, the respondent commissioner’s decision that the grant was properly terminated is supported by substantial evidence (300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Monroe Supreme Court.) Present— Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.2d 587, 432 N.Y.S.2d 573, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bridges-v-blum-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack